Variable Upload and Download Speeds
-
- On probation
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:45
- Location: Newcastle NSW
Variable Upload and Download Speeds
I would like to see a upload/Download speed selection function. 3-3.5 MB/s is too slow especially when uploading to an external HDD. Even if we can have 3 speed selections to choose from (Low, Medium, High) would be great or an automatic speed override if a recording or network action starts then speed is lowered to compensate, full speed if nothing is going on at all. (I am currently uploading 20 GB @ 1 MB/s) 350mins.) very frustrating.
-
- On probation
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:45
- Location: Newcastle NSW
Hi TheaterMan,
If you read through the history in this forum you will note that Beyonwiz allocates all the processing power it can spare to the network and external communication interfaces. Any more allocation toward external transfers causes internal functions to become unreliable or unstable.
As has been posted many times before, to maximise transfer speeds please leave the Beyonwiz in the SETUP or FILE PLAYER menus.
Regards,
Ian.
If you read through the history in this forum you will note that Beyonwiz allocates all the processing power it can spare to the network and external communication interfaces. Any more allocation toward external transfers causes internal functions to become unreliable or unstable.
As has been posted many times before, to maximise transfer speeds please leave the Beyonwiz in the SETUP or FILE PLAYER menus.
Regards,
Ian.
-
- Wizard God
- Posts: 32703
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 13:49
- Location: Canberra; Black Mountain Tower transmitters
For some examples of what the available networking speed is, see my recent measurements.
Peter
T4 HDMI
U4, T4, T3, T2, V2 test/development machines
Sony BDV-9200W HT system
LG OLED55C9PTA 55" OLED TV
T4 HDMI
U4, T4, T3, T2, V2 test/development machines
Sony BDV-9200W HT system
LG OLED55C9PTA 55" OLED TV
It would be great if the file transfer task had a bit more smarts to dynamically allocate more resourses to the file transfer when possible.
That is, if there is no current recordings running, time shifting or other tasks, then allocate much more recourses to the transfer until some other task becomes active.
This is already currently done by going into the file player or setup menu to remove the load of live decoding, but I wonder if more processing power can be reassigned.
I am assuming at the moment that file transfers have a very low priority and other tasks have a permanent pecentage of available resourse load assigned to them.
If this is so then give up more of these available resourses untill needed.
That is, if there is no current recordings running, time shifting or other tasks, then allocate much more recourses to the transfer until some other task becomes active.
This is already currently done by going into the file player or setup menu to remove the load of live decoding, but I wonder if more processing power can be reassigned.
I am assuming at the moment that file transfers have a very low priority and other tasks have a permanent pecentage of available resourse load assigned to them.
If this is so then give up more of these available resourses untill needed.
The wise learn from the mistakes of others.
_______________________________
DP-S1 + DP-P1
_______________________________
DP-S1 + DP-P1
-
- Wizard God
- Posts: 32703
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 13:49
- Location: Canberra; Black Mountain Tower transmitters
If you have a look at the measurements I referred to, then this kind of automatic allocation of network resources depending on the server load already happens. Whether there's more network bandwidth that can be squeezed out without compromising local operations is another question, I guess, but I see no reason why the Beyonwiz engineers would deliberately limit the network capacity more than they believe they need to.bohemian wrote:It would be great if the file transfer task had a bit more smarts to dynamically allocate more resourses to the file transfer when possible.
That is, if there is no current recordings running, time shifting or other tasks, then allocate much more recourses to the transfer until some other task becomes active.
This is already currently done by going into the file player or setup menu to remove the load of live decoding, but I wonder if more processing power can be reassigned.
I am assuming at the moment that file transfers have a very low priority and other tasks have a permanent pecentage of available resourse load assigned to them.
If this is so then give up more of these available resourses untill needed.
Peter
T4 HDMI
U4, T4, T3, T2, V2 test/development machines
Sony BDV-9200W HT system
LG OLED55C9PTA 55" OLED TV
T4 HDMI
U4, T4, T3, T2, V2 test/development machines
Sony BDV-9200W HT system
LG OLED55C9PTA 55" OLED TV